Monday, November 7, 2011

Astrology and Astronomy, Are They So Quite Different?

By Ganesh Kevin


There are many people within the world that don't feel that astrology is often a valid art - they will discount it as superstition and mumbo jumbo without having quite acquiring that good an understanding of what astrology really is.

Sir Isaac Newton, the most famous and accomplished scientists in the history in the contemporary globe was a firm believer during the properties and strengths of astrology, in fact after arguing around the validity of astrology he famously said on the noted astronomer and mathematician Sir Edmond Halley who had ridiculed his beliefs, "Sir, I have studied astrology, you've not."

And herein lies a thing - most in the people who dismiss astrology do so on the strength in the peripheral aspects on the science, without the need of ever definitely studying and trying to understand what astrology really is.

Ironically, for a lot of mankind's history, astrology and astronomy were classed as the exact same science, in reality it's only pretty recently that they were split into a variety of disciplines. During the formation of astrology as an art, it was impossible to be able to create astrological charts with out also with a fair degree of knowledge of astronomy. With out charts from the heavens, astrology would not have advanced significantly beyond the type that was practiced by ancient man.

In the period that can likely be seen as the birth of current astrology as we know it, the ancient Greeks had already begun to note the fundamental differences in between the disciplines. The words 'Astrologia' and 'Astronomia' were largely interchangeable on the majority of men and women and often would be employed indiscriminately in conversation, nonetheless they had been not the exact same concept. Plato, the famous philosopher taught astronomia and he classed that this was a geometrical design of planetary phenomenon. However, knowledge with the differences between the two did not make any assumptions as to whether 1 was right and the other not, they were both fully accepted in society.

However, each disciplines started being noticed as more than just numerous during the 'Age of Reason' (around 1700AD) a time which Immanuel Kant, the famous German philosopher described as "Mankind's final coming of age, the emancipation in the human consciousness from an immature state of ignorance and error." This was the beginning of astronomy getting seen as the physical behaviour from the cosmos on the purely mathematical and logical basis - a science that exists only in quantifiable measures for example physics, chemistry, mathematics and so on. Astrology is a smaller amount quantifiable in that the influences that the celestial bodies have on the influence on the interaction on life can't be said or proven via mathematical formulae.

As astronomy has moved on, it has diverged further and additional away from astrology and as science advances and astronomers can discover to see additional and extra into the heavens, this divergence is set to continue.

There are fundamental differences between astrology and astronomy and that essentially methods that whilst they each look towards the heavens they're various and have turn out to be increasingly incompatible in several ways.

Astronomers glimpse to understand the physics with the Universe, whereas astrologers use calculations for your position on the celestial bodies at particular times to drawn lines between astronomical events and corresponding earthly events. Whereas astronomers use accepted and clearly delineated scientific principles in their work, astrologers use an amassed knowledge and instinctive intuition in theirs.

Astrologers know how the Universe is basically harmonious and unchanging, astronomers know how the one of the characteristics on the Universe is that it is ever-expanding.

Astrologers know that the celestial bodies and their positioning in the heavens at any factor in time determines an individual's personality and future, astronomers know exactly where the planets and stars are from the heavens and how they scientifically relate to every other and Earth, but have discovered no quantifiable evidence to aid astrological theory.

The only real issue that astronomers will agree with astrologers with is that Earth is connected, an integral part from the fabric from the Universe and that our world is component of the cohesive cosmos and also the two aren't separate entities.

Astrology cannot supply empirically proven explanations mainly because what astrologers do isn't in accordance with the 'Known laws of nature', whereas whatever is recognized in astronomy can be proven. By the exact same token, presently a smaller amount is identified about the Universe than is to be discovered. Hence, with our provide level of understanding we possibly can't dismiss everything else that has not yet been proven.

It is possibly a shame that astronomy and astrology look to become so incompatible, as they are each fundamental truths and have existed for as lengthy as every other and will each continue to exist as long as you will find stars during the skies. Astrologers don't disbelieve astronomers or mock their science, another way about is much less forgiving and quite a few astronomers can not see any worth in astrology. However, on the day-to-day basis, far more folks do have more use for astrology than they do for astronomy. Should you ask the majority in the general population to name all of the signs of the zodiac, additional are going to be able to answer, than would be in a position to name all of the moons of Jupiter.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment